Find 1 T.s.gopalan and co recruiters on Naukri.com. Follow top recruiters across different locations / employers & get instant job updates.
YP HouseChennaiTestosterone levels Beds Gopalan and Company , Chennai, Tamil Nadu
New Zero. 2, Lakshmana Road, T Nagar, Chennai, Tamil Nadu - 600017
D/A
044 - 28158589, 28158590
9790972929
In/A
N/A
SEND ENQUIRY
SEND SMS
Chart
In/A
In/A
In/A
D/A
Contact by Email facility is usually not obtainable !!!
Own this list?
Own this list?.
Enhance your business by posting logo and photos
Edit Detailing
Document Error
Add Pictures
Consumer Evaluations
Find This Company Under Advocates, Consultants/ Laws, Lawyers, Legal Professionals
Find Similar Company Supporters in Hindi Prachar Sabha (Chennai, Tamil Nadu), Experts/ Rules in Hindi Prachar Sabha (Chennai, Tamil Nadu), Attorneys in Hindi Prachar Sabha (Chennai, Tamil Nadu), Legal Consultants in Hindi Prachar Sabha (Chennai, Tamil Nadu)
See Hindi Prachar Sabha (Chennai, Tamil Nadu) Vicinity Information
See Chennai (Tamil Nadu) Locality Tutorial
Writ request submitted under Article 226 of the Composition of India praying for thé issuance of á Writ of Cértiorari, calling for the records of the 1st respondent in I actually.D Zero. 377 of 2000 and quash its order out dated 27.03.2006
Purchase
The writ request is submitted against the initial Award handed down by the Labour Court, holding that the enquiry was not kept in a reasonable and proper manner and the same is violative of principles of natural justice and that the workman had been not given a reasonable opportunity. In the impugned Honor, the writ petitioner was given chance to prospect proof before the Work Courtroom to sustain the purchase viz., dismissing the workman. The mentioned Award is definitely the subject matter of this writ request.
2. The Supreme Court in Cooper System Small v. Shri P.P Mundhe. Mundhe reported in (1975) 2 SCC 661 has categorically held that a writ petition is not supportable against preliminary honor. The following passage discovered in paragraph 22 of the said view may be usefully produced beIow:
“22…… We should also create it apparent that there will become no justification for any celebration to stop moving the final adjudication of the dispute by the Work Court by asking its decision with regard to the original problem when the issue, if worthy, can become agitated also after the final honor. It will end up being also legitimate for the Large Court to refuse to get involved at this stage. We are making these findings in our stress that there is definitely no unnecessary hold off in commercial adjudicatión.”
3. The Management can quite nicely agitate the corréctness of the first prize after final award is passed. Hence, I was of the see that the writ petition is not supportable.
4. Appropriately, the writ request is ignored. Since the commercial dispute will be of the 12 months 2000, the Work Court is usually aimed to provide choice to the hearing of the dispute and in any occasion, dispose of the same within a period of one yr from the date of receipt of a duplicate of this order. No expenses.